Real Canadian Copyright Reforms

May 12, 2010

in Miscellaneous Musings

Dear Members of Parliament:

We must remember that the primary purpose of copyright law is provide a monetary incentive for artists to contribute to our society, and not to enrich foreign media conglomerates. We must also remember that locks only keep out honest people and that thieves and pirates will find a way to break them and steal in the absence of punishment.

We must create and reform copyright laws so that they prosecute and punish those that participate in the thievery and piracy rather than preventing honest citizens from enjoying rightfully purchased media.

When I purchase a CD I expect it to play in my computer, on my stereo and I expect to be able to import it into my phone or mobile audio device. I do NOT expect that I need to purchase that content three separate times for three separate devices. Please protect that possibility on my behalf.

Last week brought the news that Prime Minister Stephen Harper has ordered the Honourable James Moore, Conservative Minister of Heritage & Official Languages, to proceed in drafting a copyright reform bill that is likely to include strong anti-circumvention clauses and an inflexible approach to fair dealing exceptions. As a Canadian citizen and an entrepreneur in our strong technology sector, I must make clear my view that these types of laws fail to benefit the end users of technology, and Canadian industry as a whole.

In particular, anti-circumvention laws styled after those of the United States’ 1998 Digital Millenium Copyright Act serve only to reduce consumer choice while failing to prevent digital piracy in any capacity whatsoever.

Taken to their fullest extent, anti-circumvention laws prevent consumers from watching legitimately purchased films on their computers and from listening to personally owned music on their mobile devices. They encourage a marketplace that limits consumer choice and promotes vendor lock-in; a market that licenses media to consumers instead of selling it. This situation often results in the loss of personal property when DRM servers that consumers rely on to enjoy their media are inevitably shut down for economical reasons.

We are both Canadian right? If so, why do the proposed changes sound so pro-American and un-Canadian?

Thank you for your time,

Cameron Turner
A Concerned Canadian Citizen
TO: The Honourable Tony Clement – Minister Of Industry, Science & Technology
TO: The Honourable James Moore – Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages
TO: The Right Honourable Stephen Harper
CC: The Honourable Michael Ignatieff
CC: Marc Garneau – Official Opposition Critic For Industry, Science & Technology
CC: Pablo Rodriguez – Official Critic For Canadian Heritage and Official Languages
CC: Charlie Angus – NDP Digital Affairs Critic
CC: Peter Braid – MP Kitchener-Waterloo

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: