Comments on: Earth By David Brin http://www.camturner.com/2008/06/earth-by-david-brin/ A little bit of everything. My hobbies, ideas, family and career. Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:20:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Cam http://www.camturner.com/2008/06/earth-by-david-brin/#comment-11712 Cam Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:05:30 +0000 http://www.ireadscifi.com/?p=85#comment-11712 Everyone: I only approved the last comment to end this before it begins. I have no fear of the LHC and discussions of it are unrelated to the discussions of this book, so they should go elsewhere. James: How did you find this blog post so fast? Are you simply trolling for any and every loosely related place to post this canned doom and gloom comment? I've seen what you've done to other reputable discussion places, and that won't happen here. I've neutered the post as well to remove the link to your site. I'm not endorsing it. Everyone: I only approved the last comment to end this before it begins. I have no fear of the LHC and discussions of it are unrelated to the discussions of this book, so they should go elsewhere.

James: How did you find this blog post so fast? Are you simply trolling for any and every loosely related place to post this canned doom and gloom comment? I’ve seen what you’ve done to other reputable discussion places, and that won’t happen here. I’ve neutered the post as well to remove the link to your site. I’m not endorsing it.

]]> By: James Tankersley Jr http://www.camturner.com/2008/06/earth-by-david-brin/#comment-11711 James Tankersley Jr Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:58:53 +0000 http://www.ireadscifi.com/?p=85#comment-11711 I see that the GLAST telescope has been launched today. How much time might be required before analysis of GLAST data might indicate proof or rejection of Hawking Radiation theory? This could be critical in determining the safety of the Large Hadron Collider, due to begin collisions later this year. Unlike what CERN tells the public, the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment Group (LSAG) writes that current safety arguments are not valid proof of safety. Micro black holes might be created by the Large Hadron Collider, they might not evaporate, they might grow quickly and we have not been damaged by cosmic rays because cosmic rays pass harmlessly through Earth. CERN also tells the public that a new safety report has been completed, but so far the final report has not been released for review by world’s scientists. The legal complaint before US Federal Court in Hawaii demands 4 months to review this safety report and a permanent injunction if safety can not be assured to within reasonable industry standards. First hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2008. Learn more at (DELETED) I see that the GLAST telescope has been launched today.

How much time might be required before analysis of GLAST data might indicate proof or rejection of Hawking Radiation theory?

This could be critical in determining the safety of the Large Hadron Collider, due to begin collisions later this year.

Unlike what CERN tells the public, the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment Group (LSAG) writes that current safety arguments are not valid proof of safety. Micro black holes might be created by the Large Hadron Collider, they might not evaporate, they might grow quickly and we have not been damaged by cosmic rays because cosmic rays pass harmlessly through Earth. CERN also tells the public that a new safety report has been completed, but so far the final report has not been released for review by world’s scientists.

The legal complaint before US Federal Court in Hawaii demands 4 months to review this safety report and a permanent injunction if safety can not be assured to within reasonable industry standards. First hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2008.

Learn more at (DELETED)

]]>